Rising Costs and Natural Hazards Challenge State Department’s Embassy Management Efforts

The U.S. Department of State is facing a growing array of challenges in managing its global network of embassies and consulates. With approximately 9,000 owned and 16,000 leased properties across nearly 290 locations, the task of keeping these facilities secure, functional, and resilient has become increasingly complex and costly. Rising construction costs, compounded by inflation, have hampered efforts to build and maintain new embassies under the Capital Security Construction Program (CSCP). This program, which was launched following the 1998 embassy bombings in East Africa, aims to bolster security at U.S. diplomatic facilities worldwide. Since 2015, annual funding of around $2 billion has supported the construction of 99 embassies, with several of these facilities costing about $1 billion each, including high-profile projects in Kabul, Mexico City, and Beirut. However, despite this significant investment, the pace of new construction has not met initial expectations due to inflationary pressures, with the CSCP having lost $1.1 billion in purchasing power since 2015.

Maintenance has also emerged as a critical concern, with the State Department estimating a $3 billion backlog in deferred maintenance. Deferred repairs affect the safety and functionality of diplomatic facilities, many of which are in areas prone to natural hazards like earthquakes, hurricanes, and flooding. In some cases, buildings crucial to U.S. diplomatic missions remain in suboptimal condition, with 20% of these critical facilities classified as "poor" by State standards. Recognizing this shortfall, the State Department has begun differentiating between critical and non-critical assets, raising the acceptable condition standard for essential properties. However, while this refinement could improve resource allocation, it underscores the need for a robust plan to address the backlog in a sustainable way. Such a strategy would help ensure that embassy facilities meet safety and operational standards, providing decision-makers with a clearer picture of how budget allocations impact the reduction of deferred maintenance.

Staffing issues further compound these challenges. The State Department has struggled to recruit both American and locally employed personnel with the necessary technical skills for embassy maintenance, impacting facilities' upkeep and resilience. Without a comprehensive inventory of required skills for local hires, it has been difficult to match workforce capabilities with maintenance demands. Addressing this gap by developing guidance for embassies to assess and document skill needs could support more effective workforce planning, ensuring embassies have the expertise needed to address maintenance needs and respond to facility emergencies.

Additionally, natural hazards pose a significant threat to embassy infrastructure. State’s Climate Security and Resilience (CS&R) program aims to enhance the resilience of diplomatic facilities against climate risks, guided by its 2021 Climate Adaptation and Resilience Plan. However, the program remains under-resourced, with staffing shortfalls hindering its capacity to implement resilience initiatives fully. Although some staffing improvements have been made, the CS&R program lacks adequate personnel to achieve its objectives. Without additional resources and a strategic alignment between the program’s goals and available resources, embassy facilities remain vulnerable to climate-driven events, jeopardizing both physical infrastructure and mission continuity.

The GAO recommends that the State Department revisit its planning and budgetary approaches to address the cumulative impacts of rising costs, deferred maintenance, and natural hazards on embassy management. Policymakers also play an essential role in guiding this process, particularly as they evaluate State’s priorities in a climate of constrained budgets. By implementing outstanding recommendations and focusing resources on high-priority projects, the State Department can make informed adjustments to protect its investments in diplomatic infrastructure, providing safe, resilient, and functional facilities for U.S. personnel and their families abroad.

This post summarizes a public report and does not guarantee accuracy. It is not intended to provide legal or financial advice.